North Devon & Torridge Affordable Housing Policy

North Devon and Torridge adopted their joint local plan in October 2019. It states that it will “set out the long-term vision for how the towns, villages and countryside of northern Devon will develop and evolve”.

Policy ST18 of the Local Plan sets out the expectations regarding affordable housing in the area; this can be seen below:

Policy ST18: Affordable Housing on Development Sites  (1) Affordable housing provision will be required on residential development proposals on the following basis, with the thresholds for the provision of affordable housing applied unless changed in national policy or guidance:  (a) proposals for 11 or more dwellings, or for the provision of greater than 1,000 square metres (gross internal area) of residential floorspace irrespective of the number of dwellings, will be expected to provide on-site delivery of affordable housing equal to 30% of the number of dwellings (gross) on site; and  (b) in rural areas designated under section 157 of the Housing Act 1985, including the North Devon Coast Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, proposals for 6 to 10 dwellings will be expected to provide a financial contribution of broadly equivalent value to providing on-site affordable housing equal to 30% of the number of dwellings (gross) on site.  (c) If the requirement for affordable housing thresholds is removed from national planning policy or guidance then clauses (1)(a) and (1)(b) above will no longer have effect and all residential development proposals that provide for a net gain in open market housing will be required to provide affordable housing equal to 30% of the number of dwellings (gross) on site.  (2) As part of residential development proposals, where vacant buildings are brought back into any lawful use, or are demolished to be replaced by new buildings, the affordable housing requirement for the proposal will be discounted by a proportion equivalent to the existing gross floorspace of the vacant buildings unless the requirement to do so is removed or moderated by a change in national policy or guidance.  (3) Where a fraction of an affordable dwelling is required by policy, such provision will be collected through a financial contribution of broadly equivalent value to that which would have been required on-site.  (4) Where the policy seeks on-site provision, alternative off-site delivery or provision through financial contributions of broadly equivalent value may be negotiated where it can be demonstrated that on-site provision is not possible or appropriate.  (5) Negotiation to vary the scale and nature of affordable housing provision, along with the balance of other infrastructure and planning requirements, will be considered on the basis of a robust appraisal of development viability.  (6) Where it is considered that a proposal is formulated with a view to circumventing affordable housing requirements, the affordable housing provision will be re-negotiated.  (7) Affordable housing will be sought initially on the basis of a tenure mix of 75% social rent and 25% intermediate accommodation, although variation may be negotiated on the basis of identified local housing need and/or development viability.  (8) Affordable housing provision should be provided broadly in-step with market housing as development delivery progresses, be visually indistinguishable from market housing.
...and be intermixed with it across the site. Any proposed departure from these requirements will need to be robustly justified.  (9) All affordable housing will be subject to arrangements to ensure that it or provision of broadly equivalent value remains available to eligible households in perpetuity.  (10) Affordable housing will be subject to planning conditions, obligations or other legally defensible limitations to:  (a) restrict occupation to households identified as being in need of affordable housing; and  (b) in designated rural areas, give priority of occupation to households with a local connection.

As seen above, there are different requirements based on the number of dwellings proposed, combined with location of the development.

 

For general residential development where either 11+ dwellings are proposed or the total GIA will be greater than 1,000m2, 30% of the gross number of units are to be provided as affordable housing on-site.

In rural areas designated under section 157 of the Housing Act 1985, including North Devon Coast Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, developments of 6-10 dwellings will be expected to provide a financial contribution broadly equivalent to 30% affordable housing.

 

1c provides a caveat pre-empting any future change in the ‘major developments’ threshold outlined in national guidance. In the event this is removed, the 30% requirement will apply to all development with a net gain in open market housing.

The preferred tenure mix proposed by the Councils are 75% social rent and 25% intermediate accommodation. However, a variation can be negotiated on the basis of local housing needs and/or viability.

 

Vacant building credit can be applied for the existing property or properties in the development are eligible. As a result, the affordable housing requirement will be discounted by the proportion of existing floorspace. See our article on Vacant Building Credit for more information.

On-site delivery of affordable housing is preferred; however, if it can be demonstrated that this is not possible or appropriate, an off-site delivery or financial contribution may be considered.

The scale and provision of affordable housing, infrastructure and planning requirements are all subject to negotiation on the basis that a robust viability appraisal is submitted demonstrating the schemes position.

S106M management have vast experience negotiating viability in North Devon & Torridge and would recommend a site-specific viability assessment be carried out on all developments of 11+ units.

Case Study in Torridge

Amount sought = £2.1million in S106 contributions and 60 on-site affordable housing units.

Amount achieved = £1.2million in S106 contributions and zero affordable housing units.

Indicative saving = c.£10million.

 

This site in Torridge originally had outline planning permission for the development of 143 dwellings. A new hybrid application was submitted consisted of a full application consisting of a full application for 59 dwellings and an outline application for up to 141 dwellings plus commercial space.

 

The existing brownfield site had vacant buildings on, vacant building credit was applied to the proposed development.


The DV concluded that the original full planning policy requirement (24% affordable housing after vacant building credit adjustment + £2.1million in S106 contributions) was not financially viable. After a viability appraisal was submitted and accepted, a reduced S106 contribution figure of c.£1.2million was agreed to be viable in the current environment.

S106M effectively helped the client apply vacant building credit, eliminate their on-site affordable housing and reduce their S106 contributions; this resulted in an overall saving of c.£10million.

Can I develop outside the settlement boundary?
October 12, 2023

Can I develop outside the settlement boundary?

Rural exception sites are complex, and it can be challenging to bring all its elements together.
Bath and North East Somerset Affordable Housing Policy
December 6, 2022

Bath and North East Somerset Affordable Housing Policy

Can your development in Bath and North East Somerset still be viable given the different requirements of their Affordable Housing policy?
South Holland Affordable Housing Policy
September 28, 2023

South Holland Affordable Housing Policy

Will your development still be viable with the affordable housing requirements in South Holland?
High Section 106 costs are avoidable

Call us today for a free consultation. Market leader in viability assessment and Section 106 negotiation.

Call us now on
01392 840002
or
Request a call